LTTng bugs repository: Issueshttps://bugs.lttng.org/https://bugs.lttng.org/themes/lttng/favicon/a.ico?14249722912024-02-21T17:04:43ZLTTng bugs repository
Redmine Babeltrace - Feature #1410 (New): Add pretty-print sink options to override how to format floatin...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/14102024-02-21T17:04:43ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Babeltrace 2, just like its predecessor babeltrace 1.5, uses "%g" to print floating point numbers.</p>
<p>It would be useful to let users optionally override the formatting for floating point numbers, perhaps with a pretty print sink option. They could then choose if exponent notation should be used or not, choose the precision, etc.</p> Babeltrace - Feature #1300 (New): babeltrace2 lacks knowledge of bitwise enum produced by lttng-m...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/13002021-03-23T17:41:47ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>This is a follow up on <a class="external" href="https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/3045">https://review.lttng.org/c/babeltrace/+/3045</a> now that end users are starting to contact us wondering why up-to-date lttng and babeltrace2 show incomplete information for bitwise enums.</p>
<p>I think we should implement a better stop-gap solution while awaiting CTF2. I recommend that we specialize the babeltrace2 CTF input plugin to detect traces produced by the lttng-modules kernel tracer, for specific known (hardcoded) events and fields which have a bitwise enum semantic, and use this hardcoded knowledge to print the correct bitwise enum to the end user rather than "<unknown>".</p>
<p>This should ensure the current producer/consumer tools work well together (show complete information about those bitwise enums) without requiring to modify tons of documentation about the specific flags needed for bt2 to handle lttng traces appropriately. And this would not lead to misleading scenarios where we print an unknown value as a bitwise enum by mistake.</p>
<p>Hardcoded producer detection/event/fields is of course a last resort solution awaiting proper self-description in the upcoming CTF2 spec.</p> LTTng - Feature #1288 (New): Combine all per-cpu shm areas for a channel into a single filehttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12882020-10-13T15:39:03ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>On the reason for having one shm file per cpu (per channel/per uid/per session): having one file per cpu is mainly done to facilitate NUMA-local memory allocation. That being said, I wonder if as a future improvement we could combine all per-cpu buffers into a single shm file, and issue numa_set_preferred piecewise when mmapping regions of the files. This would lessen the number of file descriptors needed by a significant amount. I suspect it would work, but we'd need to do some prototyping to validate this approach first.</p> LTTng-tools - Feature #1287 (New): Use abstract sockets for lttng-consumerd UST shared memory fileshttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12872020-10-13T15:35:32ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Abstract sockets (unix(7)) are not tied to the filesystem, and are available since Linux 2.2.</p>
<p>Those are Linux-specific.</p>
<p>Those are the same as regular unix domain but their first character of path is NULL. They have the benefit of not requiring unlinking of files left behind.</p>
<p>We could use those abstract sockets in lttng-consumerd on Linux.</p> LTTng-modules - Feature #1265 (New): Turn lttng-probes.c probe_list into a hash tablehttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12652020-05-06T17:14:59ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Turns O(n^2) trace systems registration (cost for n systems) into O(n). (O(1) per system)</p> LTTng-modules - Feature #1264 (New): NOHZ support for lib ring bufferhttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12642020-05-06T17:14:02ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>NOHZ infrastructure in the Linux kernel does not support notifiers chains, which does not let LTTng play nicely with low power consumption setups for flight recorder (overwrite mode) live traces. ne way to allow integration between NOHZ and LTTng would be to add support for such notifiers into NOHZ kernel infrastructure.</p> LTTng-modules - Feature #1263 (New): Re-integrate sample modules from libringbuffer into lttng-mo...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12632020-05-06T17:13:20ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Re-integrate sample modules from libringbuffer into lttng-modules. Those modules can be used as example of how to use libringbuffer in other contexts than LTTng, and are useful to perform benchmarks of the ringbuffer library. See: <a class="external" href="https://github.com/compudj/linux-libringbuffer/tree/tip-current-ringbuffer-0.240">https://github.com/compudj/linux-libringbuffer/tree/tip-current-ringbuffer-0.240</a></p> LTTng-tools - Bug #1256 (New): Check babeltrace1 stderr output in testshttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12562020-04-08T19:23:18ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Currently, babeltrace1 stderr's output contains warnings which are not checked by the tests. Those do not fail the overall babeltrace execution, but end up being unexpected regressions when they appear between releases.</p>
<p>We could modify all babeltrace invocations to add a helper which saves the stderr output, and check that it is empty after babeltrace has completed execution. If non-empty, a test error would be reported.</p> Babeltrace - Bug #1221 (New): Babeltrace 2 sometimes fail on live trace with lttng-clear featurehttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/12212020-02-17T20:52:19ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Babeltrace 2 sometimes fail on live trace with lttng-clear feature</p>
<p>This may happen in a scenario where per-pid buffers are used, an application has just quit, and babeltrace 2 observes a stream in make_viewer_streams, but then fails to open the associated index or data file on the first get_next_index because it has been unlinked by clear.</p>
<p>The babeltrace output is:</p>
<pre>
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 E PLUGIN/CTF/MSG-ITER create_msg_stream_end@msg-iter.c:2464 [lttng-live] Cannot create stream for stream message: notit-addr=0x55b89f957980
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 W LIB/MSG-ITER bt_self_component_port_input_message_iterator_next@iterator.c:906 Component input port message iterator's "next" method failed: iter-addr=0x55b89f93f510, iter-upstream-comp-name="lttng-live", iter-upstream-comp-log-level=WARNING, iter-upstream-comp-class-type=SOURCE, iter-upstream-comp-class-name="lttng-live", iter-upstream-comp-class-partial-descr="Connect to an LTTng relay daemon", iter-upstream-port-type=OUTPUT, iter-upstream-port-name="out", status=ERROR
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 E PLUGIN/FLT.UTILS.MUXER muxer_upstream_msg_iter_next@muxer.c:444 [muxer] Error or unsupported status code: status-code=-1
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 E PLUGIN/FLT.UTILS.MUXER validate_muxer_upstream_msg_iters@muxer.c:975 [muxer] Cannot validate muxer's upstream message iterator wrapper: muxer-msg-iter-addr=0x55b89f950950, muxer-upstream-msg-iter-wrap-addr=0x55b89f9415d0
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 E PLUGIN/FLT.UTILS.MUXER muxer_msg_iter_next@muxer.c:1371 [muxer] Cannot get next message: comp-addr=0x55b89f93ebc0, muxer-comp-addr=0x55b89f93ec40, muxer-msg-iter-addr=0x55b89f950950, msg-iter-addr=0x55b89f93f3a0, status=ERROR
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 W LIB/MSG-ITER bt_self_component_port_input_message_iterator_next@iterator.c:906 Component input port message iterator's "next" method failed: iter-addr=0x55b89f93f3a0, iter-upstream-comp-name="muxer", iter-upstream-comp-log-level=WARNING, iter-upstream-comp-class-type=FILTER, iter-upstream-comp-class-name="muxer", iter-upstream-comp-class-partial-descr="Sort messages from multiple inpu", iter-upstream-port-type=OUTPUT, iter-upstream-port-name="out", status=ERROR
12-04 14:01:48.455 11884 11884 W LIB/GRAPH consume_graph_sink@graph.c:596 Component's "consume" method failed: status=ERROR, comp-addr=0x55b89f93ed30, comp-name="pretty", comp-log-level=WARNING, comp-class-type=SINK, comp-class-name="pretty", comp-class-partial-descr="Pretty-print messages (`text` fo", comp-class-is-frozen=0, comp-class-so-handle-addr=0x55b89f94c740, comp-class-so-handle-path="/usr/local/lib/babeltrace2/plugins/babeltrace-plugin-text.so", comp-input-port-count=1, comp-output-port-count=0
12-04 14:01:48.456 11884 11884 E CLI cmd_run@babeltrace2.c:2574 Graph failed to complete successfully
ERROR: [Babeltrace CLI] (babeltrace2.c:2574)
Graph failed to complete successfully
CAUSED BY [Babeltrace library] (graph.c:596)
Component's "consume" method failed: status=ERROR, comp-addr=0x55b89f93ed30,
comp-name="pretty", comp-log-level=WARNING, comp-class-type=SINK,
comp-class-name="pretty", comp-class-partial-descr="Pretty-print messages
(`text` fo", comp-class-is-frozen=0, comp-class-so-handle-addr=0x55b89f94c740,
comp-class-so-handle-path="/usr/local/lib/babeltrace2/plugins/babeltrace-plugin-text.so",
comp-input-port-count=1, comp-output-port-count=0
CAUSED BY [Babeltrace library] (iterator.c:906)
Component input port message iterator's "next" method failed:
iter-addr=0x55b89f93f3a0, iter-upstream-comp-name="muxer",
iter-upstream-comp-log-level=WARNING, iter-upstream-comp-class-type=FILTER,
iter-upstream-comp-class-name="muxer",
iter-upstream-comp-class-partial-descr="Sort messages from multiple inpu",
iter-upstream-port-type=OUTPUT, iter-upstream-port-name="out", status=ERROR
CAUSED BY [Babeltrace library] (iterator.c:906)
Component input port message iterator's "next" method failed:
iter-addr=0x55b89f93f510, iter-upstream-comp-name="lttng-live",
iter-upstream-comp-log-level=WARNING, iter-upstream-comp-class-type=SOURCE,
iter-upstream-comp-class-name="lttng-live",
iter-upstream-comp-class-partial-descr="Connect to an LTTng relay daemon",
iter-upstream-port-type=OUTPUT, iter-upstream-port-name="out", status=ERROR
</pre>
<p>notit->stream is expected not to be NULL when reaching the state STATE_EMIT_MSG_STREAM_END, but if no packet was received, it is indeed still NULL, because it is the packet header being read that moves to the STATE_CHECK_EMIT_MSG_STREAM_BEGINNING state (after_packet_context_state()).</p> LTTng-tools - Bug #1182 (New): relayd mishandles channels configured with tracefile-count == 0 an...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/11822019-04-02T17:25:50ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Relayd mistakenly considers that the criterion tracefile-count == 0 means no tracefile rotation should happen for the stream.</p>
<p>However, it's possible that tracefile-size is set to non-zero, but tracefile-count is left at its default value of 0.</p>
<p>The expected behavior would be to have an ever increasing counter (no limit) of tracefiles each "size" in size at most.</p>
<p>I suspect the relayd receiving side may also be broken, because its rotation handling code also has the same incorrect assumptions.</p>
<p>When connecting a live client to such a session, we get on the client side:<br />[error] Remote side has closed connection</p>
<p>And a PERROR on relayd:<br />PERROR - 13:16:28.097800421 [8061/8068]: opening index in read-only: No such file or directory (in lttng_index_file_open() at index.c:261)</p>
<p>Likely caused by confusion between tracefile rotation suffixes in the filename.</p> LTTng-UST - Feature #965 (New): Implement UST statedumphttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/9652015-10-22T20:43:37ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>Initial implementation: <a class="external" href="https://github.com/compudj/lttng-ust-dev/tree/statedump-notifier">https://github.com/compudj/lttng-ust-dev/tree/statedump-notifier</a></p>
<p>Missing tests in lttng-tools for this feature before we can merge it into lttng-ust.</p> LTTng-modules - Feature #964 (New): Implement support for persistent memory buffershttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/9642015-10-22T20:41:43ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.comLTTng-modules - Feature #963 (New): Implement user-space stack dump contexthttps://bugs.lttng.org/issues/9632015-10-22T20:41:10ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.comLTTng-modules - Feature #962 (New): add x86 exceptions.h and irq_vectors.h instrumentation (and m...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/9622015-10-22T19:47:19ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.comUserspace RCU - Feature #941 (New): URCU flavor which can be used across processes using shared m...https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/9412015-09-26T16:23:20ZMathieu Desnoyersmathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
<p>The appears to be interest for a URCU flavor which can be used across a set of processes communicating through shared memory.</p>