default channels should not be created when a channel has been explicitely created
As noted in bug https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/516 , creating a "default" channel if a user forgets to put "-c channel_name" in the following add-context, enable-event, etc commands is misleading. The natural expected behavior would be that the command would apply the the last enabled channel (notion of a "current" channel, like we have for sessions), but certainly not that it creates a new channel with default attributes behind the user's back.
An intermediate fix that would not require to keep a notion of current channel could be to refuse creation of a default channel if at least one non-default channel has already been created in the session.
Since this is an issue of UI correctness (it's hiding a side-effect from the user), I think it should be treated as a bug.
Updated by Daniel U. Thibault about 9 years ago
I would vote to make the
-c option mandatory, the command being rejected with a clear error message. Having a "current channel" would not only be complicated (
lttng-sessiond would need to keep each session's current channel in memory, so that when a user switches from one session to another the new session's current channel is recovered, plus the session-setting user feedback message would need to remind the user of the current channel for that session), it would lead to user mistakes (unintended effects) when re-ordering or copy-and-pasting
lttng script lines.